DUST Search - [Request] Destructible minor environmental assets

Ulysses Knapse wrote:

Eris Ernaga wrote:

KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:

Being able to destroy a tank, but not some weak civilian truck laying around the map really breaks immersion.

Things like roadblocks (including the concrete ones), boxes, those large truck vehicles on the map, it would be nice if all these things could be destroyed. It would really help make the battlefield feel more believable.

The civilian vehicles can blow up just like battle vehicles and installations, while other less explosive assets can have 3 versions with various levels of damage that they change between as they take more damage.

I would ask for destructible surface infrastructure pieces including the outposts and stuff, but I know that its asking too much for now.

Not needed or necessary this isn't battle field 3 if you like the destroyable objects in that game go play it or call of duty.

The stupidity of that statement made me cry... on the inside, of course. I'm too manly to cry on the outside.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Eris Ernaga GamersForChrist 126	Posted - 2013.04.14 02:23:00 - [1] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Being able to destroy a tank, but not some weak civilian truck laying around the map really breaks immersion. Things like roadblocks (including the concrete ones), boxes, those large truck vehicles on the map, it would be nice if all these things could be destroyed. It would really help make the battlefield feel more believable. The civilian vehicles can blow up just like battle vehicles and installations, while other less explosive assets can have 3 versions with various levels of damage that they change between as they take more damage. I would ask for destructible surface infrastructure pieces including the outposts and stuff, but I know that its asking too much for now. Not needed or necessary this isn't battle field 3 if you like the destroyable objects in that game go play it or call of duty.
Eris Ernaga GamersForChrist 126	Posted - 2013.04.14 02:42:00 - [2] - Quote Ulysses Knapse wrote: Eris Ernaga wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Being able to destroy a tank, but not some weak civilian truck laying around the map really breaks immersion. Things like roadblocks (including the concrete ones), boxes, those large truck vehicles on the map, it would be nice if all these things could be destroyed. It would really help make the battlefield feel more believable. The civilian vehicles can blow up just like battle vehicles and installations, while other less explosive assets can have 3 versions with various levels of damage that they change between as they take more damage. I would ask for destructible surface infrastructure pieces including the outposts and stuff, but I know that its asking too much for now. Not needed or necessary this isn't battle field 3 if you like the destroyable objects in that game go play it or call of duty. The stupidity of that statement made me cry... on the inside, of course. I'm too manly to cry on the outside. Why because CCP doesn't implement destructible objects? Go play call of duty or battlefield once again if you want destructible objects.
Eris Ernaga GamersForChrist 126	Posted - 2013.04.14 02:43:00 - [3] - Quote Lets be honest here destructible objects serve no purpose besides for a pretty little effect and is a waste of CCP's time.